Network Working GroupJ. Reschke
Internet-Draftgreenbytes
Updates: most popular dating sites (if approved)March 2009
Intended status: Experimental
Expires: September 2009

free sugar mummy dating sites in kenya The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Entity Tag ("ETag") Response Header in Write Operations

draft-reschke-http-etag-on-write-09

most popular dating sites canada

names of german dating sites This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.most popular dating site in the world

top 10 singles in the world Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.single bed cape town gumtree

list of german free dating sites Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress”.cheap single beds in cape town

ich suche partnerschaft The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at single beds for sale in cape town gumtree.single beds for sale in cape town

ich suche eine partnerschaft in empfang The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at second hand single beds in cape town.indian dating app ios

black speed dating los angeles ca This Internet-Draft will expire in September 2009.ich suche nach einem partner

ich suche ein partner fürs leben

free uk dating chat sites Copyright © 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.ich suche ein partner

uk singles chat rooms This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of publication of this document (free japan dating app). Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.germany top dating sites

germany best free dating site

free indian dating site bangalore The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) specifies a state identifier, called "Entity Tag", to be returned in the "ETag" response header. However, the description of this header for write operations such as PUT is incomplete, and has caused confusion among developers and protocol designers, and potentially interoperability problems.biggest german dating site

online dating search engine This document explains the problem in detail and suggests both a clarification for a revision to the HTTP/1.1 specification (RFC2616) and a new header for use in responses, making HTTP entity tags more useful for user agents that want to avoid round-trips to the server after modifying a resource.top 10 dating sites free

top 10 dating sites

100 free sweden dating site Distribution of this document is unlimited. Please send comments to the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) mailing list at top 10 dating sites belgie, which may be joined by sending a message with subject "subscribe" to top 10 dating sites uk.free worldwide dating app

free online sweden dating site Discussions of the HTTP working group are archived at <free overseas dating sites>.free worldwide dating site

free swedish dating sites XML versions, latest edits and the issues list for this document are available from <100 free foreign dating sites>.new online dating site in germany


internet singlebörse roger cicero

IdTypeStatusDateRaised By
when to give a guy your number online datingeditopen2006-08-10when to give a girl your number online dating
when to give your number out online dating edit   (type: edit, status: open)
100 free sweden dating sites [email protected]2006-08-10 Umbrella issue for editorial fixes/enhancements.
Associated changes in this document: partnersuche kostenlos testberichte fernseher, free online dating in kansas city mo, free russian personals. absolutely free dating service, free dating places in singapore.

free dating apps singapore popular german dating sites

free swedish dating websites The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) specifies a state identifier, called "Entity Tag", to be returned in the "ETag" response header (see [RFC2616], free jewish dating websites). However, the description of this header for write operations such as PUT is incomplete, and has caused confusion among developers and protocol designers, and potentially interoperability problems.free jewish singles sites

best free dating site sweden This document explains the problem in detail and suggests both a clarification for a revision to [RFC2616] and a new header for use in responses, making HTTP entity tags more useful for user agents that want to avoid round-trips to the server after modifying a resource.best free jewish dating sites

christian dating in cape town christian dating service in cape town

free sweden dating website Note that there is a related problem: modifying content-negotiated resources. Here the consensus seems to be simply not to do it. Instead, the origin server should reveal specific URIs of content that is not content-negotiated in the Content-Location response header ([RFC2616], online dating sites for adults), and user agents should use this more specific URI for authoring. Thus, the remainder of this document will focus on resources for which no content negotiation takes place.best online dating sites for young adults

most popular dating sites in the world Another related question is the usability of the weak entity tags for authoring (see [RFC2616], best online dating sites for older adults). Although this document focuses on the usage of strong entity tags, it is believed that the changes suggested in this document could be applied to weak entity tags as well.internet singlebörsen wien

free online dating in south korea free dating sites in south korea

most popular dating sites by city For a long time, nobody realized that there was a problem at all, or those who realized preferred to ignore it.best free dating apps singapore

most popular dating sites in ireland Server implementers added code that would return the new value of the "ETag" header in a response to a successful PUT request. After all, the client could be interested in it.best free singapore dating site

most popular dating sites 2016 User agent developers in turn were happy to get a new "ETag" value, saving a subsequent HEAD request to retrieve the new entity tag.speed dating los angeles california

biggest german dating sites However, at some point of time, potentially during a Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV, [RFC2518], obsoleted by [RFC4918]) interoperability event, client programmers asked server programmers to always return "ETag" headers upon PUT, never ever to change the entity tag without "good reason", and - by the way - always to guarantee that the server stores the new content octet-by-octet.looking for a single man in cape town

gratis partnersuche in österreich From the perspective of client software that wants to treat an HTTP server as a file system replacement, this makes a lot of sense. After all, when one writes to a file one usually expects the file system to store what was written, and not to unexpectedly change the contents.free dating site singapore

gratis partnersuche österreich youtube However, in general, an HTTP server is not a file system replacement. There may be some that have been designed that way, and some that expose some parts of their namespace that have this quality. But in general, HTTP server implementers have a lot of freedom in how resources are implemented. Indeed, this flexibility is one of the reasons for HTTP's success, allowing it to be used for a wide range of tasks, of which replacing file systems is just one (and not necessarily the most interesting one).top 5 indian dating websites

gratis partnersuche österreich postbus In particular: online dating singapore app

  • A server may not store a resource as a binary object - in this case, the representation returned in a subsequent GET request may just be similar, but not identical to what was written. Good examples are servers that use HTTP to access XML data ([RFC4825]), Calendaring data ([RFC4791]) or newsfeed data ([RFC5023]).
  • A server may change the data being written on purpose, while it is being written. Examples that immediately come to mind are keyword substitution in a source control system, or filters that remove potentially insecure parts out of HTML pages.

gratis partnersuche österreich pc Furthermore: filipino online dating in singapore

  • An "unrelated" method such as WebDAV's PROPPATCH (see [RFC4918], online dating apps singapore) may affect the entity body and therefore the entity tag in an unexpected way, because the server stores some or all of the WebDAV properties inside the entity body (for instance, GPS information inside a JPG image file).

most successful dating site in the world As long as servers store the content octet-by-octet, and return exactly what the client wrote, there is no problem at all.online dating singapore review

most famous dating site in the world Things get more interesting when a server does change the content, such as in the "simple authoring" example given in online dating service in singapore. Here, the server does change the content upon writing to the resource, yet no harm is done, because the final state of the resource on the server does not depend on the client being aware of that.online dating statistics in singapore

most popular dating app in the world All of the content rewriting examples mentioned above have this quality: the client can safely continue to edit the entity it sent, because the result of the transformation done by the server will be the same in the end. Formally, if we call the server-side transformation "t", the initial content "c", and the client-side editing steps "e1" and "e2", thencompletely free dating sites scotland

t(e2(e1(c))) = t(e2(t(e1(c))))

gratis partnersuche österreich zeitung e.g., it is irrelevant whether the client obtained the current entity body before doing its second edit.

best way to meet local singles free free sugar mummy dating site kenya [online dating sites in switzerland: Question: does anybody know a real-world example for server-side content rewriting where the above is not true? [email protected]] free dating sites singapore

partnervermittlung stettin campingplatz Problems will only occur if the client uses the entity body it sent, and the entity tag it obtained in return, in subsequent requests that only transfer part of the entity body, such as GET or PUT requests using the "Range" request header (see [RFC2616], free dating online singapore).partnersuche online hamburg

online dating websites korea Furthermore, some clients need to expose the actual contents to the end user. These clients will have to ensure that they really have the current representation.free dating in kansas city

online dating sites korean Entity bodies (and thus entity tags) changing due to side effects of seemingly unrelated requests are indeed a problem, as demonstrated in singlebörsen im internet kostenlos, and this specification proposes a way to resolve this in online dating in vizag.free american mobile dating sites

singles in deiner stadt geldern free english dating sites in germany

10 best dating sites in usa There are several places in the HTTP/1.1 specification ([RFC2616]) mentioning the "ETag" response header.partnersuche kostenlos testberichte digitalkamera

best kenyan online dating sites Let us start with the header definition in partnersuche kostenlos testberichte digitalkameras:single white ladies in cape town

online free dating in kenya The ETag response-header field provides the current value of the entity tag for the requested variant. Sections white singles in cape town, internet singlebörsen kostenlos and online dating in kuwait describe the headers used with entity tags. The entity tag MAY be used for comparison with other entities from the same resource (see Section list of best free indian dating sites).internet singlebörsen vergleich

best gay dating sites germany The meaning of a "response-header" in turn is defined in free black dating sites in uk:free gay dating sites in uk

online worldwide dating sites The response-header fields allow the server to pass additional information about the response which cannot be placed in the Status-Line. These header fields give information about the server and about further access to the resource identified by the Request-URI.german gay dating site

top 10 dating sites in belgium The "ETag" response header itself is mentioned mainly in the context of cache validation, such as in online dating services singapore. What is missing is a coherent description on how the origin server can notify the user-agent when the entity tag changes as result of a write operation, such as PUT.good opening messages for online dating

best christian interracial dating sites Indeed, the definition of the 201 Created status code mentions entity tags (best messages for online dating examples):best opening messages for online dating

partnervermittlung gesetz schweiz A 201 response MAY contain an ETag response header field indicating the current value of the entity tag for the requested variant just created, see Section good message for online dating.good messages for online dating examples

welche ist die beste singlebörse münchen The "ETag" response header is mentioned again in the definition of 206 Partial Content (good first messages for online dating) and 304 Not Modified (best messages for online dating sites), but notably missing are statements about other 2xx series status codes that can occur upon a successful PUT operation, such as 200 OK (best first messages for online dating) and 204 No Content (are there any real asian dating sites).best real asian dating site

online dating agency singapore Summarizing, the specification is a bit vague about what an ETag response header upon a write operation means, but this problem is somewhat mitigated by the precise definition of a response header. A proposal for enhancing [RFC2616] in this regard is made in erfahrungsberichte partnervermittlung ukraine below.japanese dating sims in english psp

japanese dating sims in english online play japanese dating sims in english

wooden single beds for sale in cape town While working on the revision of [RFC2518], the IETF WebDAV working group realized that this is a generic problem that needs attention independently of WebDAV. An initial attempt was made with [draft-whitehead-http-etag] in February 2006, but no progress was made since.japanese dating sim in english pc

single bed base for sale cape town japanese dating sims in englishgay speed dating los angeles 2016At the time of this writing in May 2007Since then, two specifications based on HTTP were just published by the RFC Editor, taking two opposite approaches: best free ukraine dating sites

used single beds for sale in cape town In essence, this makes it impossible to implement an HTTP resource that conforms to both specifications. Due to the differing use cases of XCAP and CalDAV, this may not be a problem in practice, but the disagreement in itself is scary. Publication of these specifications on the standards track will make it much harder for future protocols to deal with this topic in a meaningful way (comments were sent during IETF Last Call for CalDAV, see <best japanese dating sim game>).singles schweiz prozent

singles party schweiz singles plattformen schweiz

ich bin auf der suche nach einem partner The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL-NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].junge frauen die ältere männer lieben

partnersuche online gratis youtube The terminology used here follows and extends that in the HTTP specification [RFC2616], notably the augmented Backus-Naur Form (BNF) defined in best gay dating site los angeles of that document.singles christen schweiz

singles club schweiz singles charts schweiz

gratis partnersuche österreich kostenlos This section describes a minimal change to [RFC2616], proposed in <free online latino dating sites>.online latin dating sites

indian free dating sites 100 At the end of junge frauen die ältere männer wollen of [RFC2616], add:warum suchen junge frauen ältere männer

singles clubs in cape town The response MAY contain an ETag response header field indicating the current value of the entity tag (ältere frauen suchen junge männer hamburg) for the requested variant. The value SHOULD be the same as the one returned upon a subsequent HEAD request addressing the same variant.online dating over 50 toronto

kuwait online dating site In online dating over 50 review of [RFC2616], remove:kleinanzeigen quakenbrück kostenlos

kuwait online dating sites A 201 response MAY contain an ETag response header field indicating the current value of the entity tag for the requested variant just created, see ältere frauen suchen junge männer dating.junge frauen die ältere männer suchen

gratis partnersuche österreich linz In essence, this moves the statement about entity tags in write operations from the specific case of status 201 Created into the more generic description of the 2xx series status codes.free dating site around the world

gratis partnersuche österreich legal Note that the term "requested variant" is somewhat misleading, in particular in the context of write operations (see 100 free dating site around the worldbest free dating sites around the worldportal ältere frauen suchen junge männer<kostenlos kleinanzeigen tiere><kostenlos kleinanzeigen trier> on the RFC2616bis issues list).singles forum schweiz

singles finden schweiz singlereisen schweiz

partnersuche online gratis indiene The 'Entity-Transform' entity header provides information about whether a transformation has been applied to an entity body.100 free korean dating sites

single mothers support group cape town When used in an HTTP request, its meaning is undefined. In an HTTP response, it provides information whether the server has applied a transformation when the entity was stored last.christian chat rooms in cape town

when should you give your number online dating In general, entity headers may be stored in intermediates. The main use of this header however applies to the HTTP PUT method, of which by default the results are not cacheable (see [RFC2616], single christian ladies in cape town). In addition, the value format is defined so that a client can reliably detect whether the information is fresh.christian singles club cape town

partnervermittlung in schweiz Format:

Entity-Transform = "Entity-Transform" ":" entity-transform-spec
entity-transform-spec = entity-transform-keyword SP entity-tag
entity-transform-keyword = "identity" | "unspecified"| token

entity-tag = <entity-tag: defined in [RFC2616], christian speed dating los angeles>
token = <token: defined in [RFC2616], junge frauen suchen ältere männer verliebt>

gratis partnersuche österreich jobs The entity-tag specifies the entity body to which this information applies.german christian dating sites

gratis partnersuche österreich gratis An entity-transform-keyword of "identity" specifies that the origin server has stored the entity octet-by-octet, thus the user agent MAY use a local copy of the entity body with the given entity-tag for subsequent requests that rely on octet-by-octet identity (such as a PUT with "Range" request header).singles sächsische schweiz

best gay dating site in uk Both the absence of this response header and any entity-transform-keyword value other than "identity" specify that the origin server may have transformed the entity before storage, thus a subsequent retrieval will not necessarily return an exact copy of the submitted entity.singles suchen schweiz

kostenlos kleinanzeigen münchen single muslim male cape town

gay dating websites in uk Content was stored octet-by-octet:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
ETag: "1"
Entity-Transform: identity "1"

gay dating sites in uk Content was transformed:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
ETag: "2"
Entity-Transform: unspecified "2"

100 free married dating sites uk Response containing a stale "Entity-Transform" header:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
ETag: "3"
Entity-Transform: unspecified "2"

free married dating sites uk Note that in this case the newly assigned entity tag and the entity tag returned in "Entity-Transform" do not match, thus the client is aware that the header value is stale and can't be used.

singles reisen schweiz singles treffen schweiz

free dating website ukraine The clarification of [RFC2616] (see partnersuche kostenlos testberichte zwillingskinderwagen) makes it clear that user agents can use "ETag" headers obtained in write operations, as long as they do not require octet-by-octet identity. In particular, a new entity tag can be returned for any method, such as a WebDAV PROPPATCH (see [RFC4918], partnersuche kostenlos testberichte zelt). This helps dealing with the problem described in best german dating sites free. See kostenlos kleinanzeigen leipzig for details.reviews best online dating sites

free latino dating websites The addition of the "Entity-Transform" header (see rating online dating websites) enables origin servers to signal that they stored an exact copy of the content, thus allowing clients not to refetch the content. Note that by default (in absence of the response header), a client can not make any assumptions about the server's behavior in this regard. Thus clients will only benefit from new servers explicitly setting the new header.partnervermittlung yupin thailand

when to give your phone number online dating when to give out your number online dating

free dating latin singles This document specifies the new HTTP header listed below.when to give your number online dating

Header field name:
Entity-Transform
Applicable protocol:
http
Status:
informational
Author/Change controller:
IETF
Specification document:
singles events schweiz of this specification

kostenlos kleinanzeigen.at kostenlos kleinanzeigen aufgeben tiere

top 10 christian dating sites uk This specification introduces no new security considerations beyond those discussed in junge frauen suchen ältere männer in berlin of [RFC2616].singles schweiz kostenlos

online dating sites in spanish References

ebay kleinanzeigen kostenlos zu verschenken Normative References

[RFC2119]
ältere reiche frauen suchen junge männer, “singles börsen schweiz”, BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2616]
singles bern schweiz, singles baden schweiz, free dating sites in jeddah, ältere frauen suchen junge männer forum, dating sites for free completely, kostenlos kleinanzeigen einstellen, and partnervermittlung pl sql, “online dating sites for young adults”, RFC 2616, June 1999.

partnersuche online usa Informative References

[draft-whitehead-http-etag]
kleinanzeigen kostenlos und ohne anmeldung, “singles veranstaltungen schweiz”, Internet-Draft draft-whitehead-http-etag-00 (work in progress), February 2006.
(As of November 2006, there didn't appear to be any activity related to this draft.)(Not updated since.)
[HTML]
free dating site for germany, Hors, A., and I. Jacobs, “best dating site for germany”, W3C REC-html401-19991224, December 1999, <kostenlos kleinanzeigen in berlin>.
[RFC2518]
kostenlos kleinanzeigen immobilien, single bed for sale cape town gumtree, welche ist die beste singlebörse irland, welche ist die beste singlebörse italien, and uk mobile dating sites, “ältere frauen suchen junge männer münchen”, RFC 2518, February 1999.
[RFC4791]
junge frauen die ältere männer mögen, singles schweiz zahlen, and singles zug schweiz, “singles wandern schweiz”, RFC 4791, March 2007.
[RFC4825]
completely free latin dating sites, “free married dating website uk”, RFC 4825, May 2007.
[RFC4918]
free christian dating website uk, “online dating sites for older adults”, RFC 4918, June 2007.
[RFC5023]
indian dating apps ios and singles männer schweiz, “junge frauen suchen ältere männer youtube”, RFC 5023, October 2007.

free chat line numbers in memphis tn welche ist die beste singlebörse app

kostenlos anzeigen ch free foreign dating sites

top 10 cougar dating sites uk Let us consider a server not having the quality of preserving octet-by-octet identity, for instance because of SVN-style keyword expansion in text content (<best free international dating sites>).free international dating sites online

most popular dating sites canada free In this case, the client has previously retrieved the representation for <http://example.com/test>, and the server has returned the ETag "1":free international dating site for singles

most popular dating website canada >> Request (1)

GET /test HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com

most popular dating sites uk free >> Response (1)

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plain
ETag: "1"

# $Revision: 1 $
Sample text.

most popular dating website free The client now wants to update the resource. To avoid overwriting somebody else's changes, it submits the PUT request with the HTTP "If-Match" request header (see [RFC2616], second hand single beds for sale in cape town):how to ask a girl for her phone number online dating

free international dating sites in uk >> Request (2)

PUT /test HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
If-Match: "1"

# $Revision: 1 $
New sample text.

free international dating sites canada If the resource was modified in the meantime, the server will reject the request with a 412 Precondition Failed status:online dating when to ask for second date

welche ist die beste singlebörse vergleich >> Response (2a)

HTTP/1.1 412 Precondition Failed
Content-Type: text/plain

Precondition Failed: entity tag supplied in If-Match request header
did not match current.

partnersuche online gratis hd In this case, the client usually has take care of merging the changes made locally with those made on the server ("Merge Conflict").free worldwide online dating site

partnervermittlungen in der schweiz If there was no overlapping update, the server will execute the request and return a new entity tag:100 free worldwide online dating

partnersuche online gratis net >> Response (2b)

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plain
ETag: "2"

welche ist die beste singlebörse wien Note however, that at this point the client knows the new entity tag, but doesn not know the current representation, which will have been updated by the server to:

# $Revision: 2 $
New sample text.

dating site germany free What seems to be a problem at first may not be a real problem in practice. Let us assume that the client continues editing the resource, using the entity tag obtained from the previous request, but editing the entity it last sent:free worldwide online dating sites

translated japanese dating sims english >> Request (3)

PUT /test HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
If-Match: "2"

# $Revision: 1 $
A third attempt.

japanese dating sim in english free Assuming there was no overlapping update, the PUT request will succeed:free dating online ukraine

free dating websites singapore >> Response (3)

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plain
ETag: "3"

free online dating in nova scotia Note that the only problem here is that the client doesn't have an exact copy of the entity it is editing. However, from the server's point of view this is entirely irrelevant, because the "Revision" keyword will be automatically updated upon every write anyway.warum suchen sich junge frauen ältere männer

partnersuche online gratis dublado In any case, the final contents will be:ältere frauen suchen junge männer stuttgart

# $Revision: 3 $
A third attempt.

free online dating sites singapore free dating site sg

100 free latin dating site In the example above (partnervermittlung pl cda, partnervermittlung pl chomikuj), the server returns an ETag response header upon PUT, although the content actually was rewritten due to keyword substitution.free dating sites south korea

completely free latin dating site A server implementing this specification would instead respond with:south korean free dating site

partnervermittlung bauern schweiz >> Response (2c)

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plain
ETag: "2"
Entity-Transform: unspecified "2"

partnervermittlung behinderte schweiz This indicates that the content that was sent is not octet-by-octet identical to what a subsequent GET request would retrieve. It is then up to the client to decide whether it wants to re-fetch the content before continuing edits.kleinanzeigen kostenlos veröffentlichen

kostenlos kleinanzeigen vorarlberg single moms dating cape town

partnervermittlung büro schweiz In this example, the server exposes data extracted from the HTML <title> element ([HTML], welche ist die beste singlebörse deutschland) as a custom WebDAV property ([RFC4918], homes for single mothers cape town), allowing both read and write access.online dating in south korea

partnervermittlung be2 schweiz In the first step, the client obtains the current representation for <http://example.com/test.html>:dating sites hamburg germany

partnervermittlung brasilien schweiz >> Request (1)

GET /test.html HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com

partnervermittlung senioren schweiz >> Response (1)

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html
ETag: "A"

<html>
  <head>
  </head>
  <body>
  </body>
</html>

free foreign online dating sites Next, it adds one paragraph to the <body> element, and gets back a new entity tag:single mom support group cape town

free dating sites across the world >> Request (2)

PUT /test.html HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
If-Match: "A"

<html>
  <head>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>First paragraph.</p>
  </body>
</html>

totally free dating sites around the world >> Response (2)

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
ETag: "B"

dating sites free uk best Next, the client sets a custom "title" property (see [RFC4918], free dating in kuwait):best online dating app singapore

online dating sites for free in uk >> Request (3)

PROPPATCH /test.html HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Content-Type: application/xml

<proppatch xmlns="DAV:">
  <set>
    <prop>
      <title xmlns="http://ns.example.org/"
      >A sample document</title>
    </prop>
  </set>
</proppatch>

dating sites free ukraine >> Response (3)

HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: application/xml

<multistatus xmlns="DAV:">
  <response>
    <href>/test.html</href>
    <propstat>
      <prop>
        <title xmlns="http://ns.example.org/"/>
      </prop>
      <status>HTTP/1.1 2OO OK</status>
    </propstat>
  </response>
</multistatus>

dating sites 100 free uk The server knows how to propagate property changes into the HTML content, so it updates the entity by adding an HTML title document accordingly. This causes the entity tag changing to "C".top free kenyan dating sites

pakistani dating sites free uk The new entity body is shown below, but the client does not realize that it did change at all.

<html>
  <head>
    <title>A sample document</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>First paragraph.</p>
  </body>
</html>

catholic speed dating los angeles A subsequent attempt by the client to update the entity body will fail, unless it realizes that changing WebDAV properties may affect the entity as well. In this case, it would have had to get the current entity tag before proceeding. Of course, this introduces an additional round-trip, and a timing window during which overlapping updates by other clients would go unnoticed.free kenyan dating sites

free international dating free international dating line

best free dating in germany Below we repeat the example from above (free dating kent co uk), but here the origin server returns entity tags for all write operations, and the user agent knows how to deal with them. That is, both take advantage of what [RFC2616] already allows.free christian dating co uk

english dating websites in germany >> Request (3)

PROPPATCH /test.html HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Content-Type: application/xml

<proppatch xmlns="DAV:">
  <set>
    <prop>
      <title xmlns="http://ns.example.org/">
        A sample document
      </title>
    </prop>
  </set>
</proppatch>

singles hotel schweiz >> Response (3)

HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: application/xml
ETag: "C"

<multistatus xmlns="DAV:">
  <response>
    <href>/test.html</href>
    <propstat>
      <prop>
        <title xmlns="http://ns.example.org/"/>
      </prop>
      <status>HTTP/1.1 2OO OK</status>
    </propstat>
  </response>
</multistatus>

japanese dating sim games english As before, this causes the entity to change, and a new entity tag to be assigned. But in this case, the origin server actually notifies the client of the changed state by including the "ETag" response header.all local free chat line numbers

partnervermittlung lord schweiz The client now will be aware that the requested entity change, and can use the new entity tag in subsequent requests (potentially after refreshing the local copy).100 free online dating in spain

online dating in spain free online dating sites in kenya

online dating in kenya online dating in korea

partnervermittlung in stettin Add and resolves issues "entity-header" and "extensibility", by removing the extension hooks, and by redefining the header to it can be used as an Entity header.what is the best online dating site in south africa

free singapore dating site free dating sites scotland

dating websites for free no sign up Update APP and CALDAV references. Remove RFC3986 reference (not needed anymore after the simplication in draft 01). Fix typo in header description ("submitted entity", not "stored entity"). Remove comparison about how XCAP and CALDAV profile RFC2616: after all, both mandate a behaviour that was legal but optional before. Add "Updates: RFC2616".100 free dating sites scotland

free online singapore dating site free online singapore dating sites

dating website free no sign up In the references, note that there was no activitiy on draft-whitehead-http-etag-00 anymore. Change intended status to "Experimental". Update APP reference. Update statements about current status of XCAP and CALDAV. Add and resolve "clarify-extension".partnervermittlung pl online

germany mobile dating sites welche ist die beste singlebörse bayern

dating sites online completely free Update XCAP reference. Update header definition to use prose rules rather than comments. Clarify "identity" keyword when appearing with a weak entity-tag. In PROPPATCH/HTML example, fix whitespace so that the HTML title element has exactly the same value as the one that was PROPPATCHed. Mention that ETags changing due to a PROPPATCH could even occur in presence of a WebDAV write lock. Expand keyword substitution example with variant where Entity-Transform is returned.welche ist die beste singlebörse berlin

free south african black dating sites single parents club cape town

dating sites ireland completely free Update APP reference. Update CalDAV reference (published as RFC4791). Update "prior work" (RFC4791 being published, XCAP having been approved).single parent groups cape town

junge frauen suchen ältere männer test free korean online dating sites

online dating ukraine free credits Update XCAP reference (published as RFC4825). Update "prior work" (RFC4825 being published).free south korean dating sites

free korean dating sites absolutely free kenyan dating sites

singles aus der schweiz jobs Replace RFC2518 references with RFC4918 where appropriate. Update APP reference.most popular gay dating sites in australia

most popular dating websites in australia most popular dating app in australia

gay dating site los angeles Update APP reference. Reference the "requested variant" issue on the RFC2616bis issues list (<biggest dating site in australia>).most popular dating apps in australia

free worldwide dating sitesfree jewish singles websites 

best free korean dating site free korean dating site

american mobile dating sites Update pointer to RFC2616bis "requested variant" issue.

how to ask a girl for her number online dating

free us mobile dating sites Julian F. Reschke
greenbytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16
Muenster, NW 48155
Germany
Phone: free dating apps japan
EMail: online dating app singapore
URI: 100 free dating in kenya