online dating profile help for guys Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Locking Protocol

totally free dating apps uk

online dating write profile The identifier is a name for the issue (and is unique within this document).

beste datingsite nederland The type of issue is one of:

wat is de beste datingsite in belgie The status of the issue is one of:

how do you respond to an online dating profile The reference is an indication of where the issue was first raised.

why does no one respond to my online dating profile The description is a succinct overview of the issue.

online dating profile headlines The resolution describes the specification change that resolves the issue.

Open Issues

Identifier Type / Status Reference and Description Proposed Resolution / Latest Change
dating for black professionals uk
online dating profile headline ideas open
wat is de beste gratis datingsite Right now the server uses the IF: header to verify that a client knows what locks it has that are affected by an operation before it allows the operation. Must the client provide the root URL of a lock, any URL for a pertainent loc, or some specific URL in the IF: header.

wat is de beste christelijke datingsite british dating site free: It is felt by the group that it's important that the client not just own and hold the lock token, but that it also know where the lock is rooted before it does tasks related to that lock. This is just a point of info. The issue itself still needs to be brought up and answered.still

wat is de beste datingsite voor hoger opgeleiden msn email erstellen kostenlos: Summary: current implementations do not seem to care (see chat kostenlos ohne anmeldung). Suggestion to require clients to specify the lock root anyway, because this is what the WG agreed upon earlier.
latest change in seriöse partnervermittlung dresden
julie partnervermittlung dresden
online dating profile headline tips open
Reference: <im takt partnervermittlung dresden>

wat is de beste online dating site partnervermittlung dresden kosten: What resource should be flagged in the multistatus response to locking issues in COPY/MOVE requests?
latest change in partnervermittlung ute dresden
Resolved to flag the locking errors at the source resource that was affected by the problem. The details of how to describe the error was deferred to a subsequent version of WebDAV. - 6/15/02 - 2518bis does not reflect this.
christian dating websites uk
exclusive dating websites uk open
Reference: <partnersuche in polen kostenlos>

wat is de beste datingsite van belgie The method of describing the details of (beyond what resolved by COPYMOVE_LOCKED_STATUS_CODE_CLARIFICATION) of the underlying cause of various locking and ACL COPY/MOVE problems is deferred. Two proposals were outlined in the discussion, but interest was not great and we clearly don't have interoperability to take these proposals forward.
latest change in free singaporean dating site
russische frauen gesucht
automatic online dating profile generator open
partnersuche russland kostenlos partnersuche remscheid, 2004-05-25: Umbrella issue for editorial fixes/enhancements. latest change in partnersuche remscheid umgebung
partnersuche kostenlos ohne anmeldung at
online dating profile name generator open
partnersuche russland doku partnersuche kostenlos at, 2005-03-02: Specify safeness and idempotence of LOCK and UNLOCK methods. latest change in uk online dating 100 free

Closed/Editor Issues

Identifier Type / Status Reference and Description Resolution / Latest Change
disabled dating uk 100 free
Reference: <uk 100 percent free dating sites>

free dating service for senior citizens partnersuche im internet alter, 1998-11-09: Perform a thorough review of the specification to ensure that URI and URL are used correctly, and consistently throughout.

meine stadt karlsruhe partnersuche partnersuche im reifen alter, 2004-06-22: Use "request URI" when talking particularily about HTTP messages because this is the term used by RFC2616. Use "URL" when talking about HTTP/WebDAV resources. Use "(internal) member URI" when talking about collection membership (term is defined IN RFC2518). Otherwise use URI, making sure that if a relativeURI (as defined by RFC2396) is allowed, we say so.
partnersuche im alter:
Seems to have been deferred: partnersuche im alter schwierig, but there is some follow on discussion on what exactly needs to be clarified: new free uk dating sites, but no specific action was concluded besides the fact that we don't need to wait for RFC2396 to be updated or request any changes/clarifications to that.
Closed for now with the changes proposes by Julian R.
vertrag partnervermittlung
Reference: <vertrag partnervermittlung kündigen>

single parent travelling with child to cuba verträge für partnervermittlung, 1998-11-24: The discussion of generating UUID node fields without using the IEEE 802 address in wellnessurlaub für singles deutschland can be moved to an appendix.

single parent travel with child to mexico gruppenreisen für singles deutschland, 2004-04-31: Plan: get rid of the section altogether and refer to draft-mealling-uuid-urn. In the meantime, move the whole opaquelocktoken discussion into an appendix.
hotel für singles deutschland:
(1) Moved to appendix. (2) UUID URNs aren't ready; delay this to future revisions.
kinderwunschklinik für singles deutschland
Reference: <wandern für singles deutschland>

single female international adoption reisen für singles deutschland, 1998-11-29: If URL Ub is locked, creating a lock-null resource, then if a COPY is performed listing Ub as the destination, COPY will remove the lock-null resource, removing the lock, then perform the copy. A note needs to be added stating that the delete performed by the Overwrite header is atomic with the rest of the operation.
the best free uk dating sites:
See uk dating apps iphone
uk free singles sites
beste datingsites in nederland Jim Amsden: The specification requires a lock to be refreshed if any method is executed, by anybody, on a locked resource. This can cause some performance problems. More importantly, the semantics of this refresh do not seem to be right -- why should a random GET by a third party cause all locks to be refreshed? black and white dating sites free uk:
We should remove the mention of this behavior in 2518: play speed dating games online
speed dating 2 games online
Reference: <singles bars in frankfurt>

single parent adoption agencies meet singles in frankfurt, 1999-05-18: einloggen states that if a lock cannot be granted to all resources in a hierarchy, a 409 status response must be issued. Yet, the example in single bars in frankfurt am main which demonstrates this uses a 207.

single parent adoption agencies india speed dating role play card games, 2004-04-24: Comment: 207 is correct, fix the bad spec text.
play speed dating 3 game:
top uk dating apps
Reference: <partnersuche uelzen>

online dating profile questionnaire 1999-06-15: Keith Wannamaker: best uk dating sites over 50 explicitly states that the response from a successful lock request MUST include the Lock-Token header, yet the examples in 8.10.8, 8.10.9, and 8.10.10 aren't compliant with this requirement, and should be updated.
dating sites uk over 50s:
Make obvious editing changes to the examples: partnersuche in frankreich Note that this only applies to the example for a successful lock creation, not for refreshes.
play speed dating game online
Reference: <speed dating game free online>

why is nobody responding to my online dating profile partnersuche alternativ, 1999-06-07: Jason Crawford's list of lock issues sent to the list.
partnersuche altersunterschied:
Replace with list of distinct issues 040_LOCK_ISSUES_??.
partnersuche alternativ schweiz
Reference: <olg dresden partnervermittlung>

how to reply to online dating profile partnersuche app android, 1999-06-07: new free uk dating site: ""Having a lock token provides no special access rights..."
I suggest that the phrase "owned by another party" be added in this first sentence to distinguish between owning and having. It speaks of "having" in this sentence but not subsequently. In fact "submitting" might be an even better word than having.
partnersuche die zeit:
Agreed, use "submitting".
vergleich singlebörsen stiftung warentest
Reference: <speed dating movie online free>

tanzen singles frankfurt speed dating full movie online, 1999-06-07: free online dating services in canada: "... However resource are free to return any URI scheme so long as it meets the uniqueness requirements."
This is technically correct, but it might also be useful to say that the scheme should make the URI be readily recognizable as a *LOCK* state token in the event that other types of state tokens exist. I mention this because we seem to have created the possibility of other types of state tokens. -- Your call. :-)

fun online dating profile names is there a free online dating service, 2004-04-24: Disagreement: any URI scheme can be used as a lock token. Specifications that define other types of state tokens will have to take care of distinguishing them inside an "If" header.
free online dating service india:
No change.
free online dating services for seniors
Reference: <free online dating services in south africa>

funny online dating profile names partnervermittlung russische frauen in deutschland, 1999-06-07: gratis partnersuche ohne anmeldung Write lock.
I believe this definition of a write lock is not right... or not complete... judging from what I read elsewhere. I believe one can do these operations without a write lock... as long as someone else doesn't have a write lock on the resources effected. I also believe it doesn't prevent LOCK requests in the case of shared locks.

how to make a good online dating profile name partnerbörsen gratis, 2004-06-16: Remove paragraph and copy relevant section from GULP.
gratis partnerbörsen vergleich:
partnerbörse gratis test
Reference: <gratis partnerbörse tirol>

funniest online dating profile pictures gratis partnerbörse steiermark, 1999-06-07: partnerbörsen gratis österreich Write Locks and Collections.
It says that if members are locked in a conflicting manner, then their collection can't be locked. That seems ambiguously safe to say, but I suspect that text should mention depth since if the parent lock request is depth 0, I don't think we let the members lock state effect the success of the LOCK request. The possible exception is what we said about protecting a URI that was used to perform a lock (of a member of the collection). I'm not sure what we'd like to say for that. In the advanced collection meetings we refered to these being "protected" and avoided speaking about "lock"ing the URI. This creates an odd situation though.
singlebörse für hartz 4 empfänger:
Clarify that this only applies to the attempt to depth-infinity lock the collection.
online partnersuche stiftung warentest
Reference: <best dating sites for over 50s uk>

how to write a good online dating profile examples dating sites uk over 50, 1999-06-07: silvesterreisen für singles in deutschland Write Locks and COPY/MOVE
It says that a lock doesn't move with a moved resource. Of course if the lock is on the resource, not the URI, it should move with the resource. But then we have the caveat that we are also protecting the LOCK'd URI. I think the rule should be that if we submit the locktoken with the MOVE request, we are allowed to have the LOCK move with the resource and the lock will now protect a different URI. Also, ALL locks in the subtree must be submitted or the MOVE must fail because otherwise it would break our URI protection rule.
reisen für singles in deutschland:
No change: LOCKs are lost then the locked resource is moved. Will also be clearer once GULP is incorporated.
wanderurlaub für singles in deutschland
Reference: <urlaub für singles in deutschland>

how to create an awesome online dating profile partnersuche ü50, 1999-06-07: Upon cursory reading of the rfc 2518 sec 8.10.4 through 8.11 I was confused by the plethoria of error codes. Nothing seems to unify them.
8.10.4 speaks of a return code of 409 Conflict if a lock can't be granted.
- Firstly, I can't tell if it is saying that the 409 is within the multistatus body... or in the response header.
- Secondly, later text seems to use a different status codes and never mentions this one again.
8.10.7 lists status codes
- 200 OK, 412 Precondition Failed, and 423 Locked are listed, but 409 Conflict (mentioned above) is not.
- In the case of 412 Precondition Failed, the description the follows doesn't seem to describe a "precondition failed". And it sounds like it's talking about an access request that includes a "locktoken", not a LOCK request that generates one.
- The 423 Locked condition also sort of sounds like it's talking about an access request rather than a LOCK request.
8.10.10 lists LOCK status codes
- 207 Multistatus which was not mentioned above
- 403 Forbidden which was not mentioned above.
- 424 Failed dependency which was not mentioned above.
- we don't mention what the failure response should look like.
- comment: 200 OK seems like a better response than 204 No Content. The brief explanation isn't persuasive and seems to say that the response code should serve the purpose of the Content-Length. header.
- we should probably explicitly say if an UNLOCK can only be done on the original resource... and will fail even if the resource specified is locked by virtue of being a child of the original resource. Or is this too obvious? I know it's something easy to goof up in an implementation.

great male online dating profile examples partnervermittlung antoinette, 2004-06-04: (1) 8.10.4 is wrong. The return code is 207. See issue 037_DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS, resolved in draft 01.
(2) General agreement that descriptions of error marshalling needs to be redone. This applies both th LOCK and UNLOCK.
(3) Agreement that the argument given for 204 is lame; clients should handle all 2xx status codes with the notable exception of 207 as "success". We may want to explain that in RFC2518bis' section about 207.
partnersuche für über 50jährige:
Resolved after cleaning up error marshalling descriptions and rewriting the statement about UNLOCK and status 204.
partnersuche über 50 erfahrungen
Reference: <partnersuche saarland über 50>

great online dating profile sample partnersuche über 50 vergleich, 1999-06-07: 9.4 If header
- BNF suggests that IF's content must be all tagged or all untagged.
- doesn't say if there can be two If headers in a request. Might we want a tagged one and an untagged one?
- I must be misunderstanding this, but it sounds to me like that state of a resource(s) must match one of the locktokens listed in the request. But what if some of the resources are locked and others are not. The unlocked resources definitely won't contain state that's listed. Are we precluding operations on regions that might not be entirely locked? -- Is this a valid observation or a red herring? If header - untagged example
- See my comment about regions that are not entirely locked.
9.4.2 If header -tagged state
- So if we've applied a lock with depth.... and now we're doing a DELETE on a subtree of that tree and we've tagged the locktoken we've submitted, will this prevent that locktoken from apply'ing to ALL the resources of the subtree... and thus prevent the COPY from succeeding? Or are we supposed to tag the lock token with the root of the LOCK even if that is not part of what we are deleting? Or should the request use untagged locktokens?
9.4.3 If header - NOT operator
- Why do we want this? of course... why not? :-)
Overall, the If header seems backwards for locktokens. It's client driven rather than server semantics driven. The only feature it seems to provide is perhaps the ability for the client to request that the request be aborted if the resource no longer is locked. Other than that it seems to complicate the simple process of letting the server know what tokens you hold. I'd think we'd just want a different header to declare what lock tokens we hold and let the server (not the client) decide how they affect the success of the request.
free dating sites instant chatting:
This issue needs to be handled in the base protocol.
free dating and chatting
Reference: <online dating services in canada>

how to write a successful online dating profile alternative partnersuche online, 1999-06-07: Shared locks... read locks...
Our justifcation for shared locks ("Shared locks are included because....") seems faulty. It's not a mechansim for dealing with programs that forget to release their locks. That remains a problem with shared locks. In this case they'd forget to release a shared lock and block exclusive lock users. Timeouts and administrative action are the solutions to this problem... not shared locks.
BTW, I'd think that the use of exclusive locks is just fine. I do have a problem with shared locks though... or at least shared write locks. Although they were relatively easy to define, I see them as solving a red herring problem of multiple entites cooperatively writing using distinct locks. I say it's a red herring because they don't know each other well enough to use the same lock but they do know each other well enough to not step on each other. This seems unlikely. As does the managing a compatibility matrix and getting all the entities to abide by it.
OTOH I see another more common problem that is being overlooked. I see a class of folks whose purpose is to not actually write to a (set of) resource(s), but to simply prevent others from writing to it while they are looking at it. Shared write locks do not necessarily do that because with a shared write lock. someone else could grab a shared lock and go ahead and write. The only way to block that is to get an exclusive write lock. But doing that prevents anyone else from doing what you're doing despite it being pretty benign.
An expedient solution is to say that a shared write lock should not necessarily give one the right to modify a resource. All it should do is prevent others from writing. And then the purpose of an exclusive write lock is just to insure that others can't get a lock and block you from writing. Now is this the right solution? Probably not. There probably should be something called a read lock that actually prevents writes as a side effect.... and would tend to get used in shared mode.
Anyway, as it is, I think the shared write locks are a red herring and we're missing something we are more likely to need... shared read locks.

writing an amazing online dating profile plenty of fishes dating site, 2004-06-17: Reject: shared lock semantics have been stable since publication of RFC2518. However, state what the advantage of a shared lock in this case is.
singles mit niveau kostenlos:
online dating service australia
Reference: <gratis singlebörse tirol>

writing an interesting online dating profile kostenlos und ohne anmeldung chat room, 1999-07-23: If a URL ending in a slash is null locked, is it legal to do a PUT to it? That is, does the URL ending in slash set the resource type to a collection, or does the first PUT/MKCOL set the resource to a ordinary, or collection resource.
kostenlos und ohne anmeldung single chat:
See is there any free online dating sites
gmx e mail erstellen kostenlos
Reference: <partnersuche pforzheimer zeitung>

writing your online dating profile examples meine stadt pforzheim partnersuche, 1999-07-23: In some cases, such as when the parent collection of a resource is locked, a 423 (Locked) status code is returned even though the resource identified by the Request-URI is not locked. This can be confusing, since it is not possible for a client to easily discover which resource is causing the locked status code to be returned. An improved status report would indicate the resource causing the lock message.

online dating profile photo advice bars für singles in frankfurt, 2004-04-25: Proposal to define a specific precondition element plus specific child elements similar to partnersuche zeitungsinserat.

online dating profile picture tips partnersuche zeitung, 2004-06-18: See summary and proposal in free online dating websites india.
partnerbörse für senioren:
partnerbörse kostenlos test
Reference: <email hotmail kostenlos>

how to make a better online dating profile hotmail email anmelden kostenlos, 1999-11-23: email account kostenlos hotmail states that a LOCK method request SHOULD have an XML request body. This SHOULD should instead be MUST.

single parent adoption success stories msn hotmail kostenlos email, 2004-04-25: Clarify that for creating LOCKs, it MUST have a request body which SHOULD have the DAV:owner element. For LOCK refreshes, no body is required.
an international single day point prevalence study for severe sepsis and or septic shock:
Clarify that LOCK refresh MUST NOT have a request body. Also clarify Lock-Token header vs If header. See dating websites for over 50 uk.
over 50 dating sites reviews uk
Reference: <singles bar in frankfurt>

partnerbörsen internet test singles international dating, 1999-11-26: singles international conference denver states, "If a lock owner causes the URI of a resource to be added as an internal member URI of a locked collection then the new resource MUST be automatically added to the lock." However, though this is the intent, the specification does not explicitly state that this behavior only applies to depth infinity locked collections. The words "Depth infinity" should be added before the word "locked" in this sentence.
singles international kostenlos:
Agreed; make that change.
free dating sites for over 50s uk
Reference: <dating site for over 50s uk>

how to build a successful online dating profile urlaub für single mit kind in deutschland, 2000-01-27: The fact that use of authentication credentials with submission of lock tokens is required should be strengthened in the document.

how to make your online dating profile better singles in deutschland nach alter, 2004-05-02: Submitting the lock token in an If header (usages != UNLOCK) SHOULD be restricted to whatever the server thinks the "owner" of the lock is.
singles in deutschland:
Duplicate of singles in deutschland 2016.
silvester single party frankfurt main
Reference: <partnersuche kreis paderborn>

making a good internet dating profile uk dating app iphone, 2000-03-04: The specification is currently silent on how to use the If header for submitting a locktoken when performing a DELETE in a Depth infinity locked collection. Should the If header have both the collection URL and the Request-URI, or just the Request-URI? An example of this is needed.

kontaktbörse online kostenlos partnerbörse kostenlos seriös österreich, 2004-06-19: See partnersuche 50: existing servers accept both. This is consistent with the concept of "if it appears in the If header, it's submitted". We still need to say something about lock state token evaluation in the If header, though.
unternehmungen für singles in frankfurt:
Closed. See issue best online dating service canada for the question of how lock tokens are evaluated in the If header.
hotmail email kostenlos einrichten
worst online dating profile photos of all time At present, the WebDAV specification is not excruciatingly explicit that writing to a locked resource requires the combination of the lock token, plus an authentication principal. At one point, the spec. discusses an "authorized" principal, but "authorized" is never explicitly defined. hotmail email kostenlos erstellen:
Submitting the lock token in an If header (usages != UNLOCK) SHOULD be restricted to whatever the server thinks the "owner" of the lock is. See discussion at partnerbörse test kostenlos.
single und partnersuche
angela hiltbrand partnervermittlung Should it be possible to seize a lock, or for any principal to unlock a lock, thus making it easier for another client to begin working on a locked resource. single und partnersuche
Duplicated by UNLOCK_BY_NON_LOCK_OWNER issue.
reisepartner gesucht irland
Reference: <reisepartner gesucht anzeige löschen>

partnervermittlung hiltbrand reisepartner gesucht, 2000-07-11: reisepartner gesucht facebook of RFC 2518 indicates that clients may submit a lock refresh without a body. However, it implies that clients could submit a lock refresh with a body. Server implementations have been disallowing a lock refresh with a body. It might make sense to codify this practice, and disallow submission of a body on a lock refresh.
reisepartner gesucht neuseeland:
Clarify that LOCK refresh MUST NOT have a request body. Also clarify Lock-Token header vs If header. See there should be a single official international language.
partnersuche 50 plus meine stadt
how do i make a good online dating profile partnersuche 50 gold: Is the complexity of the IF header appropriate for the simple task o verifying that a client knowingly owns a lock? The IF header seems to serve a different purpose. One of those purposes is for the server to verify that you have the lock token (and that you know the root of it?). Another is for the client to check some preconditions before doing an action. Another seems to be to specify what lock to refresh in a lock refresh request. This seems to create ambiguity in our definition of the semantics of the IF: header.

partnersuche südtirol mit foto online dating agency uk: It is felt by the group that it's important that the client not just own and hold the lock token, but that it also know where the lock is rooted before it does tasks related to that lock. This still leaves the lock referesh issue unresolved.

making your online dating profile upmarket dating agencies online uk, 2004-06-02: Re.: using Lock-Token to identify the lock to be refreshed (free online dating agency uk): problems with current rfc2518bis-05 wording; also no support in popular implementations; suggestion to roll-back changes in -bis and keep "If" header based syntax.
single tours international:
Do not change existing RFC2518 semantics now. See discussion around anzahl singles in deutschland 2014.
single international travel groups
Reference: <hotmail e mail kostenlos einrichten>

create an online dating profile kochkurs für singles frankfurt, 2001-03-01: What do you return if the unlock request specifies a URL on which the lock does not reside? What if it's on a URL that is locked by the lock, but it's not the resource where the lock is rooted?

tips for making an online dating profile partnervermittlung 50+, 2004-06-01: New discussion, resolution pending. See partnervermittlung 50 plus.
partnervermittlung harmonie 50plus erfahrungen:
should i create an online dating profile Resolution (as of May 31, 2004) from RFC2518 issues list: Resolved that you can specify any URL locked by the lock you want to unlock. (partnersuche test kostenlos) We should resolve the issue of UNLOCK'ing other URLs in a few days. See also singles in deutschland alter.
singles international adoption
Reference: <singles international rv club>

build my online dating profile singles travel international facebook: Shouldn't we be using an IF header to do an UNLOCK seeing as you need to prove you are holding a lock before you can remove it? (This might be contingent on singles trips abroad)
wieviel singles in deutschland 2013:
Testing of current implementations shows that servers indeed use the "Lock-Token" request header to specify the lock to be removed; and that they do not require an additional "If" header. No change. See also single haushalte in deutschland 2013.
dating seiten komplett kostenlos
Reference: <meet international singles free>

single parent traveling abroad with child international singles conference denver colorado: What should UNLOCK return if a bad token is provided or no token. (This might be contingent on partnersuche romantik 50 plus.)

building an online dating profile partnersuche 50 plus berlin, 2004-06-06: According to the rewritten description, this will be a 4xx with condition code DAV:lock-token-matches. Check the status codes for existing implementations, though.

creating an effective online dating profile chat frau sucht mann, 2004-06-07: Results: (a) Microsoft IIS 5.0: (a1) no lock token: 400, (a2) bad lock token: 412, (a3) unlocked resource: 412. (b) Apache/Moddav 2.0.49: (b1) no lock token: 400, (b2): bad lock token: 400, (b3) unlocked resource: 400. (c) SAP Enterprise Portal 5SP6: (c1) no lock token: 412, (c2): bad lock token: 412, (c3) unlocked resource: 412. (d) Xythos (Sharemation): see (c).
kenyan christian dating sites:
Clarify that the Lock-Token header does not contribute to the set of preconditions that are relevant for a 412 status. Thus other 4xx status code are be recommended here (note that more details can be obtained by processing the optional DAV:error response body). See also veranstaltungen singles frankfurt
reisepartner nach island gesucht
Reference: <upmarket dating agencies uk>

examples of a good online dating profile reisepartner für vietnam gesucht: The LOCK renewal request should not us an IF header to specify what lock is being renewed. This limits the use of the IF header.
partnersuche in kanada:
Rejected. See also hotmail email adresse kostenlos erstellen
hotmail email einrichten kostenlos
Reference: <partnervermittlung werbung song>

writing a great online dating profile de beste datingsite: If a LOCK request is submitted to a URL that doesn't have a parent collection, what should be the correct response? Other methods, PUT, MKCOL, COPY, MOVE all require a 409 response in this case. Seems like LOCK should have this requirement as well.
studenten singlebörse aachen:
Resolved that since LNRs no longer exist (see NULL_RESOURCE_CLARIFY) the server should return 409. We should insure that the new text we add to replace LNRs does not create an ambiguity: studenten singlebörse graz. See DAV:parent-resource-must-be-non-null precondition.
studenten singlebörse schweiz
Reference: < single>

example of a great online dating profile create a online dating profile: If the DAV:lockdiscovery property is requested from an unlocked resource, what is the correct response? Apache mod_dav responds with an empty mod_dav sends an empty lockdiscovery element (<D:lockdiscovery/>) while IIS sends an empty prop element (<D:prop/>), that is, it sends no lockdiscovery element at all.

online dating profile pictures tips creating a online dating profile, 2004-04-25: The difference shouldn't matter for clients, and they need to expect both. In general, servers that DO support locks on that resource should return an empty element.
write a online dating profile:
Added example.
writing a online dating profile
Reference: <make an online dating profile>

help filling out online dating profile chat für alleinerziehende singles: What status code should be returned when a lock null resource is created - 200 OK or 201 Created? A related issue is what status code should be returned by a PUT or MKCOL on a lock-null resource? MKCOL is defined to be 201, PUT could be 200 or 201 (201 seems like a slightly better choice).
chat für alleinerziehende singles kostenlos:
Resolved via the proposal to remove LNR and replace them with ordinary resources and by the following wording: forum für alleinerziehende singles. See partnerbörse für alleinerziehende singles
die besten dating seiten kostenlos
help writing online dating profile examples die beste dating seite: At present, the specification is not explicit about who might be capable of grabbing a lock token via lock discovery and the submitting it in UNLOCK (and/or for a subsequent write operation). It is OK for the resource owner to grab the lock token and do UNLOCK/write? Is it OK to have a "grab lock token" privilege that can be assigned to anyone? reisepartner gesucht australien 2017:
Resolved in part by putting it under ACL control: reisepartner finden australien work and travel and the response that follows it.
reisepartner island gesucht
help with creating online dating profile Proposal to remove lock null resources from the spec until we are motivated to have them or something equivalent. In the meantime, keep the spec silent on the topic in order to avoid precluding LNR or the equivalent in a future version of WebDAV. single trips abroad:
LNRs removed. See discussions preceding conclusion: single travel international reviews and single parent international adoption. Closes single mother international adoption, single mom international adoption blog, single mom international adoption.
single woman international adoption
help with writing online dating profile The DAV:owner field of a lock is controlled by the locking client and should not be manipulated by the server. This is the only place the client can store info. The roundtrip details should match what we resolve for the PROP_ROUNDTRIP issue. Examples should also be checked. dating portal berlin kostenlos:
Resolved by repeated statement and no disagreement.
berlin dating kostenlos
Reference: <casual dating berlin kostenlos>

help with my online dating profile young singles travel international: It would be good if a client could look at a locked resource that it was planning to unlock and also find out if it's depth locked and where the depth lock is rooted.
single parent international travel with child:
Proposed solution: singles travels international approved. See also partnersuche kostenlos ab 30
international single parents dating sites
Reference: <reisepartner vietnam gesucht>

tips online dating profile weihnachten singles frankfurt: How does a client determine if a given lock was created by it?
wo kann man als single urlaub machen:
It was resolved that this type of info would not be provided by the server. The client creating the lock could store owner info in the DAV:owner field (or some field defined in the future) if it wishes. The querying client can also check ACL's to get similar info.
reisepartner nach irland gesucht
Reference: <reisepartner für irland gesucht>

need help with my online dating profile veranstaltungen für singles frankfurt: There might not be any implementations of shared locks. If so, remove them.
alleinerziehende mütter partnersuche:
The thread did conclude that shared locks interoperate although it doesn't look like they get used much. Also see: traudich partnervermittlung tirol.
seriöse partnervermittlung tirol
Reference: <partnervermittlung tirol>

writing a good internet dating profile online dating profilbild tipps: There is some confusion on how a PROPFIND response should express the fact that a resource has multiple shared locks on it. It was suggested that the spec become clearer.
online dating profil beispiel:
Resolved trivially that it's probably worthwhile to demonstrate a correct response for this situation in one of the examples.
online dating profil
Reference: <online dating profile generator>

how to make an interesting online dating profile online dating profile samples: If one finds a locked resource, it might be one of several resource locked by a depth lock. How does one determine the root of the lock?
online dating profile:
Resolved to support a dav:lockroot element in the lock discovery property: online dating profile pictures See upmarket dating sites uk
exclusive dating sites uk
Reference: <exclusive dating agencies uk>

how to create an amazing online dating profile dave m online dating profile: de beste dating sites states that a dav:locktoken tag can have multiple <dav:href> tags in it. Is this right? And is it trying to suggest that a single (shared) lock might have multiple locktokens?
de beste datingsite in nederland:
It is resolved that section 12.1.2 was incorrect and that only a single lock token URI should be allowed there. Also it is resolved that a lock only has a single lock token.
de beste datingsites in nederland
single parent traveling with child consent letter uk de beste datingsite van belgie, 2004-06-19: "depth" can never have the value "1". de beste datingsites van nederland:
wat is de beste datingsite
Reference: <responding to online dating profile>

how to write great online dating profiles respond to online dating profile, 2003-12-18: Under the topic of "Refreshing Locks", it hints that Client may include a Timeout header. But, Depth header has not being mentioned. Under the topic of "Depth and Locking", it discussed what will happen if "Depth" header is specified for creating a new lock. But, nothing was mentioned on what's its implication on a lock refreshing command.
tips to online dating profile:
Clarify that servers MUST ignore the Depth header upon LOCK refresh. See write online dating profile examples.
write a good online dating profile
Reference: <how to write a internet dating profile>

partnervermittlung in wien singlebörsen kostenlos frauen, 2004-06-14: gute singlebörsen kostenlos für frauen Write Locks and Collections. "...or issues a DELETE to remove a resource which has a URI which is an existing internal member URI of a write locked collection, this request MUST fail if the principal does not have a write lock on the collection."
This is consistent with RFC2518's definition of DELETE, however the requirement to remove *all* URIs mapped to the resource is incompatible with BIND and has been removed in RFC2518bis-05. Thus we should rewrite section 7.5 as: "..., or issues a DELETE to remove an internal member URI of a write locked collection, this request MUST fail if the principal does not have a write lock on the collection."
creating a good online dating profile:
creating a successful online dating profile
Reference: <how to create a catchy online dating profile>

best men's online dating profile examples how to create a online dating profile, 2004-06-04: Returning DAV:lockdiscovery on error seems to be (a) useless and (b) underspecified (the example given in section 8.10.10 isn't compliant to the multstatus response format).
how to create a good online dating profile:
Specify returning DAV:lockdiscovery just upon success. Fix example (will use precondition names when they are defined). dating
beste datingsites belgie writing a good online dating profile, 2005-02-12: Clarify BNF syntax (Notation, and when used). example of a online dating profile:
how to write a online dating profile
beste datingsite nederland 2013 how to write a good online dating profile, 2005-01-30: Delegate the definition of UUIDs to draft-mealling-uuid-urn. hotmail email erstellen kostenlos:
Done. See also kochkurse für singles frankfurt.
should i make an online dating profile
beste datingsite nederland gratis make online dating profile stand out, 2004-04-14: Locking extracted from RFC2518. creating an online dating profile tips:
Finished as of draft 00.
creating an online dating profile
countries open to single parent adoption build an online dating profile, 2004-05-25: Make specification text compatible with GULP where it isn't. Integrate GULP as normative specification of the locking behaviour. make a great online dating profile:
Integrate GULP as is, let remaining text refer to it where appropriate. Also add pointers from GULP back into the main document. Rename section to "Collected Method Semantics.
partnervermittlung ab 50 jahren
countries that allow single parent adoption 2014 partnervermittlung bosnien, 2004-04-25: Import error marshalling and terminology from RFC3253. writing a successful online dating profile:
keys to a successful online dating profile
great online dating profile pictures successful online dating profile examples, 2005-02-13: Mention the principal that was authenticated when the lock was created as part of the state of a lock; disambiguate with what previously was called "lock owner". making a successful online dating profile:
help with online dating profile
how to write good online dating profile need help with online dating profile, 2004-12-04: Update references to RFC2396 with draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07. help with online dating profile free:
writing a funny online dating profile
how to write your online dating profile funniest online dating profiles, 2004-05-23: Ensure that examples use only sample domains as per RFC2606. making a funny online dating profile:
writing an awesome online dating profile
how to write an online dating profile for a woman great online dating profile example, 2004-04-25: Update references of RFC2068 to either RFC2396 or RFC2616. frau sucht frau kostenlos berlin:
chat x single gratis
single parent traveling with minor child canada chat x single gratis senza registrazione, 2005-01-01: Fix reference to draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07. reisepartner gesucht usa westküste:
Update to RFC3986.

single parent adoption stories

Version Issues
single parent adoption stories uk online dating profile maker |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||single partys frankfurt main |||||
how to make a great online dating profile how to build a good online dating profile ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||how to create a good internet dating profile |tips for creating a good online dating profile |||||
how to make a online dating profile tips for creating a great online dating profile ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||how to build a great online dating profile ||||tips for online dating profile for guys |||||
how to create a funny online dating profile sample online dating profile for guys ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||singles vacations international ||singles travel international tours |||||
how to write a good internet dating profile how to create online dating profile |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||how to improve online dating profile |||how to write a good online dating profile okcupid |||||
wo sollte man als single urlaub machen write an awesome online dating profile ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||how to write a good online dating profile (advice for women) |||||||how do i write a great online dating profile ||||||||
partnerbörsen im internet stiftung warentest how to make your online dating profile more appealing |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||tips for online dating profile photos |||||||||tips to write online dating profile ||||||||||||||
reisepartner irland gesucht tips for online dating profile pictures |||||||||||||||||||||||tips to a good online dating profile ||||||online dating profile tips for guys ||||||||||||||||||||||
online dating profile picture examples online dating profile tips uk ||||how to set up a online dating profile ||||||||||||||||||||de beste gay dating sites ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
best online dating profile headlines wat zijn de beste datingsites ||||online dating profile bio template |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

how to write an online dating profile that works Last change: 2005-05-16